Can an AI-generated image be field evidence?
No. A generated image can illustrate an abstract concept only when clearly labeled, but it cannot prove that a Famidi delivery, person, place, or project existed.
What this means in practice
Do not mix generated imagery into an evidence gallery without unmistakable disclosure.
Synthetic faces can still create misleading emotional impressions.
Famidi’s documentary pages should prefer authentic, traceable field media and keep illustration separate.
What responsible proof looks like at Famidi
Famidi separates financial records, operational records, and field evidence because they answer different questions. It favors precise claims and can document work through supplies, infrastructure, process, wide scenes, and source trails without demanding maximum exposure from recipients.
Evidence should be read for what it directly supports. Archive coverage is not automatically a beneficiary count, a fundraising appeal is not proof of completion, and one image rarely proves an entire project cycle.
Check the underlying information.
Editorial standard: This page is reviewed by a person, sourced to Famidi records or authoritative references, and revised when the program or underlying guidance changes. It does not replace legal, tax, medical, or financial advice.