How does Famidi choose locations for water projects?
Location review should consider the demonstrated water-access need, community use, practical access, land and permission questions, contractor feasibility, geology, and the ability to document and support the project.
What this means in practice
A social-media request alone is not a technical site assessment.
The most visible community is not automatically the most feasible or highest-priority site.
Famidi should distinguish a proposed or scouted location from a funded and completed project.
How Famidi documents water infrastructure
A Famidi water project moves through location review, local contracting, construction, completion checks, and a public handoff record. Evidence may include agreements, expenses, construction stages, finished taps or pumps, water flow, and a project identifier.
A photograph cannot establish water quality, yield, maintenance performance, or long-term reliability by itself. Those questions require the appropriate technical test, record, or follow-up.
Check the underlying information.
Editorial standard: This page is reviewed by a person, sourced to Famidi records or authoritative references, and revised when the program or underlying guidance changes. It does not replace legal, tax, medical, or financial advice.